Formulation and Characterization of Biocompatible Microspheres of Benzophenone-3

 

Rathor Shruti1 *and Ram Alpana2

1* School of Pharmacy, Ckosey Engineering College, Lal Khadan, Bilaspur (C.G.)

2S.L.T.Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidhlaya, Bilaspur (C.G.)

 

ABSTRACT

The objective of present study was to develop gelatin microsphere containing Benzophenone-3 (Benz-3) for topical delivery, evaluating the effect of stirring speed, Effect of polymer concentration  and effect of cross linker (sugars) on particle size, surface morphology, microencapsulation efficiency and in vitro drug release. Gelatin microspheres were prepared using emulsion cum thermal gelation technique by dropping Benz-3 and cross linker containing solution of gelatin, into preheated Soya oil. The USP paddle method was selected to carry out the dissolution studies carried out in methanol at pH=5.5 (pH was adjusted by using 0.2M NaOH). It was found that the microspheres with fructose and sucrose have smooth surface having particle size 29.6µm and 80.63µm, respectively. But untreated and glucose treated microspheres have wavy surface with particle size 50.32 and 45.02µm. It was observed that untreated microspheres and microspheres crosslinked with cross linked sucrose showed faster release of drug although microspheres cross linked with fructose and glucose showed delayed release of drug. In vitro drug release data showed that the formulation cross linked with fructose was best for sustained release of Benz-3 due to 95% release of drug after 12 hrs with t50 and t70 of 400min and 560min, respectively. The release of Benz-3 was influenced by the different cross linkers. Drug release kinetic from the fructose cross linked microspheres corresponded best to the first order kinetics.

 

KEYWORDS: Bez-3, Emulsion cum thermal gelation technique, gelatin, microspheres.

 

INTRODUCTION

Controlled release of sun screening agent is of interest, for many molecular sunscreens penetrate in to the skin causing photo allergic reactions and skin irritation. The photo degradation of sun filter molecules produces sub molecule potentially dangerous for skin because they induce sensitization and irritation of skin. Therefore there is urgent need for the development of safer sunscreen system. One of the most common methods of controlling the rate of drug release is micro encapsulation. The encapsulation technique normally involves water insoluble polymer as carrier which require large quantity of organic solvents for their solubalization. As a result this process becomes vulnerable to safety hazards, toxicity and cost of production increases also, making the technique nonreproducible, economically and ecologically at industrial scale. Recently, various biocompatible and biodegradable water soluble polymers have been investigated and played great role in replacing organic solvent in the preparation of microspheres. One another major aspect is cross linkers who are generally employed in the microencapsulating method where they convert soluble matrix into insoluble matrix like formaldehyde and glyceraldehydes. But use of such cross linker causes toxic effects due to presence of residual amount of cross linker. Alternative conditions of cross linking were used to reduce toxic effects associated with the cross linker like thermal hardening and use of sugar for cross linking. The microsphers were prepared by emulsion cum thermal gelation technique were gelation of polymer was achieved by the addition of aqueous solution of polymer and cross linker into preheated soya oil.


PG No. 1:Effect Of Different Sugar On Surface Characteristics; (A)and(B) – Wavy, (C)and(D) – Smooth

 

Table  No. 1 Effect of stirring speed on particle size of GMs of benz-3.

S. No.

Cross Linker

 

Particle Size (µm) at

Different Stirring

Speed (rpm)

250

500

750

1

2

3

Sucrose

Glucose

Fructose

114.8

120.3

104.6

96.2

86.3

70.8

80.63

45.05

32.6

 

Table No. 2 Effect of Gelatin Concentration on surface characteristics of microspheres.

S. No.

Gelatin concentration

cross linker

GMs Surface

1

 

 

2

 

 

3

0.75gms

 

 

1.5gms

 

 

3.0gms

Sucrose

Glucose

Fructose

Sucrose

Glucose

Fructose

Sucrose

Glucose

Fructose

Smooth

Wavy

Smooth

Wavy

Smooth

Smooth

Highly rough

Highly rough

Highly rough

 

Natural polymer such as gelatin has been extensively used for the preparation of particulate drug delivery system by virtue of its biocompatibility and biodegradability along with absence of toxicity or allergic problems. Being a water soluble polymer, gelatin has to be chemically cross linked to become insoluble at 37ºC. This microspheres can be efficiently employed in the sustained delivery(1, 3).

 

Benzophenone-3 (2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone) is a commonly used sunscreening agent in the topical formulation to prevent sunburn and may also provide some protection against drug related or other photosensitive reactions associated with UVA light. The main effect of Benzophenone-3 is that it absorbs light throughout the UVB range (290-320nm) and also absorbs some UVA light with wavelengths of 320-360nm and some UVC light with wavelength of 250-290nm. Benz-3 is commonly used in a concentration up to 6% w/w(2).

 

Figure No. 1 In vitro drug release from microspheres.

 

Table No. 3 Effect of Cross Linker on particle size and surface characteristics of GMs of benz-3

S. No.

Cross Linker

Particle Size (µm)

GMs Surface

1

Gelatin

50.32±10.0

Wavy

2

Gelatin/Glucose

45.02±7.5

Wavy

3

Gelatin/Sucrose

80.63±8.3

Smooth

4

Gelatin/Fructose

32.6±4.0

Smooth

 

Table No. 4 Effect of Cross Linker on Microencapsulation Efficiency..

S. No.

Cross Linker

Microencapsulation Efficiency

1

2

3

Sucrose

Glucose

Fructose

80%

92%

89%

 

Materials:

For microspheres- Benzophenone-3 (Fulford (India) Ltd, USA), gelatin, fructose, soya oil, Acetone, calcium chloride (fused).

 

Methods:

Microencapsulation method:

Microspheres were prepared by emulsion cum thermal gelation technique. 10 ml of 15% w/v gelatin solution containing 5% w/w of sugar, at 80°C, were added to 200ml Soya oil. 500 mg Benzophenone-3 was added to the gelatin solution. The mixture was mechanically stirred to form o/w emulsion, under laminar flow, after 5 mints the solution was rapidly cooled at 15°C. 250ml of acetone were added to dehydrate and flocculate coacervate droplets. The microspheres was isolated by filtration through sintered glass filter. Residual oil over the microspheres was removed by washing with 250ml of acetone. After preparation of microspheres they were stored at room temperature in a dessicator at 8% relative humidity, otherwise drying conditions can influence gelatin microspheres release of drug. Fiftee mm diameter vessel, a three blade turbine rotator of 35 mm in diameter and stirring speed of 750 r.p.m. was selected, 500mg/batch of gelatin were used and the ratio between gelatin solution and oil phase was 0.21(v/v)(1,4).

 

Figure No. 1 In vitro drug release from microspheres.

 

Characterization of Micospheres:

Particle size analysis of gelatin microspheres was determined using binocular microscope. Surface morphology and particle size of microspheres were also studied using scanning electron microscopy(5).

 

Drug content and drug release measurements of microspheres:

10 mg of gelatin microspheres was milled and immersed in methanol and stirred for 3 h and then left at room temperature overnight. Benzophenone-3 was soluble in this medium. The remaining gelatin particles were separated. Drug Content of this solution was determined using UV spectrophotometer at 285nm. In vitro drug release from microspheres was determined in methanol at pH=5.5 (pH was adjusted by using 0.2M NaOH). 2 g of microspheres were placed in 900 ml release medium in USP paddle type dissolution rate test apparatus, stirring at 40 rpm. The release medium was maintained at 37±0.2ºC. 5 ml Samples of release medium were removed at different time intervals and replaced with the same amount of fresh medium each time(8). Samples were analyzed spectrophotometrically at 285 nm(6).

 

Microencapsulation efficiency:

Drug content or microencapsulation efficiency was determined as the ratio of actual quantity of drug encapsulated within the gelatin microspheres to the theoretical quantity of drug added during the emulsification phase and was expressed as percentage(7) .

                                 Actual Yield

% Entrapment =                        *  100

                              Theoretical Yield

 

Result and discussion

Effect of stirring speed – We have tested the effect of stirring speed on particle size. We modulated the stirring speed and obtained that the drug loaded microspheres which were cross linked with glucose, and sucrose showed the particle size 114.8, 96.2, 80.63 and 120.3, 86.3, 40.05µm at 250, 500, and 750 rpm respectively. Whilst drug loaded microspheres which were cross linked with fructose showed the particle size 104.6, 70.8, 32.6 µm at the same stirring speed (table no1).

Effect of gelatin concentration – We selected three different concentration i.e 0.75gm, 1.5gm and 3.0gm of gelatin. Drug loaded microspheres with 0.75gms and 1.5gms gelatin and with two cross linkers (sucrose and fructose) showed the smooth surface whilst the glucose at same concentration showed the wavy surface. In contrast drug loaded microspheres with 3.0gms of gelatin concentration resulted in highly rough surface when cross linked with all three cross linkers (table no2).

 

Effect of cross linker - One possible mechanism which is involved in the cross linking of gelatin is – The aldehyde group of reducing sugars eg. Glucose or fructose can react with free amino groups of gelatin molecule resulting in the formation of aminoglycosides. These aminoglycosides again reacts with another amine group and result in formation of cross linked structure (table no3 and pg no1) (1, 3, 4).

 

3.1 Morphology of drug loaded microspheres – Drug loaded microspheres with all three cross linkers showed good spherical geometry, and in no case aggregation phenomenon was seen. Micropheres cross linked with glucose showed wavy surface but cross linker sucrose and fructose showed smooth surface. All these microspheres were free from microscopic pores. The particle size of drug loaded microspheres cross linked with glucose and fructose had almost the same diameter. In contrast microspheres cross linked with sucrose showed increase in particle size.

 

3.2 Microencapsulation efficiency – It was observed that the drug loaded microsphere with sucrose and glucose showed microencapsulation efficiency of 80% and 92% respectively. But drug loaded microspheres with fructose showed the 89% microencapsulation efficiency (table no.4) (8).

 

3.3 In vitro drug release profile from drug loaded microspheres – The dissolution of drug loaded microspheres both treated and untreated with cross linking agent was performed at 37ºC in order to simulate typical conditions of dissolution at body temperature. It was observed that drug loaded microspheres cross linked with glucose and fructose resulted in a slower release of drug and t50 and t70 were increased. Whilst drug loaded microspheres cross linked with sucrose was dissolved in same fashion as untreated drug loaded microsheres and t50 and t70 of this microspheres were decreased (figure no2) (8, 9, 10).

 

CONCLUSION:

The present study was carried out to develop sustained drug delivery system for benzophenone -3 using gelatin as polymer and fructose as cross linking agent. Smooth and spherical particle were successfully developed by the emulsion cum thermal gelation technique. Stirring speed 750 rpm was most suitable for smaller size microsphere preparation. Result demonstrated that glucose and sucrose if used as crosslinker, larger size of microspheres were obtained with high and low microencapsulation efficiency respectively while fructose provides smaller size microspheres with optimum microencapsulation efficiency.  Percentage drug release from the sucrose cross linked microspheres were faster and same as untreated microsphere while glucose and fructose cross linked microspheres showed slower release rate. Hence the microspheres with 750rpm stirring speed, 1.5gms gelatin as polymer and fructose as a cross linker could be


successfully employed for formulating sustained release of Benz– 3. Further the microspheres could also be incorporated into cream ointment or lotion base.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors are thankful to Mr. O. P. Prajapati (Asst. Manager QC), Fulford (India) Ltd., ZYG Pharma, Pithampur (M.P.) for providing gift samples of Benzophenone-3, butylenes glycol and xanthum gum. We are extremely thankful to AICTE for providing fund.

 

REFERENCES:

1.        Cortesi R, Nastruzzi C, and Davis SS Sugar cross-linked gelatin for controlled release: microspheres and disks. Biomaterials. 1996; 19:1641-1649.

2.        Cosmetics and toiletries magazine. Sun Care Formulary. 2005; 120(1): 80-102.

3.        Brime B, Bellsteros MP, and frutos P. Designed preparation and in vitro characterization of gelatin microspheres containing levodopa for nasal administration. J. of Microencapsulation. 2000; 83: 731-735.

4.        Esposito E, Cortesi R and Nastruzzi C. Gelatin microspheres: influence of preparation parameters and thermal treatment on chemico-physical and biopharmaceutical properties. Biomaterials. 1996; 17, 2009-2020.

5.        Dinarvand R, Rahmani E, and Farbod E. Gelatin microspheres for controlled release of all trans retinoic acid topical formulation and drug delivery evalution. Iranian J. pharm. Science. 2003; 47-50.

6.        Mladenovska K, Kumbaradzi EF, Dodov GM, Makraduli L and Goacinova K. Performed biodegradation and drug release studies of BSA loaded gelatin microspheres.Int. J. Pharmaceutics. 2002; 24: 242-249.

7.        Choudhary Dipak K and Mitra Ashim K. Kinetics of in vitro release of a model nuecleoside deoxyuridine from cross-linked insoluble collagen and collagen-gelatin microspheres. Int. J. Pharmaceutics. 1999; 193: 113-122.

8.        Vandelli MA, Rivasi F, Guerra P, Forni F and Arletti R. Gelatin microspheres crosslinked with D,L-glyceraldehyde as a potential drug delivery system: Preparation, characterization, In vitro and in vivo studies. Int. J. Pharm. 2001; 215: 175-184.

9.        Saparia Beena, Murthy RSR and Solanki A. Prepared and evaluated chloroquine phosphate microspheres using cross-linked gelatin for long-term drug delivery. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2002; 64(1): 48-52.

10.     Kazuhiro M, Hideyuki K, and Yoshito I. Evaluation of gelatin microsphere for nasal and intramuscular administrations of salmon calcitonin. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2001; 13: 179-185.

11.     Patel VA, Patel HV, Kotadiya RM. Formulation and characterization of chitosan methotraxate beads by ionotropic gelation. Ijper. 2009; 43(1): 71-77.

12.     Chun Myung-Kwan, Su Chong, and Choi Hoo-Kyun. Mucoadhesive microspheres prepared by interpolymer complexation and solvent diffusion method. Int. J. Of Pharmaceutics. 2004; 288: 295-303.

13.     Palmieri GF, Martell S, Lauri D and Wehrle P. Gelatin-Acacia complex coacervation as a method for ketoprofen microencapsulation. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1996; 951-957

14.     Martin Alfred, Chun AHC and Bustamante Pilar. Physical pharmacy. Lea and Febiger Philadelphia, London. 1993; 325-354.

15.     Vanichtanukul D. The effect of core to wall ratio and span 80 concentration on the properties of ascorbic acid. J microencapsulation, 1998, 15(6), 753-759.

16.     Bodmeier R, Wang J. Microencapsulation of drug with aqueous colloidal dispersions. J pharm Sci, 1993, 82(2), 191-194.

17.     Robinson J, and Lee Vincent H. Controlled drug delivery, fundamentals and applications. Marcel Dekker Inc., Newyork. 2005 : 172-174.

18.     Neylor MF, Farmer KC The case for sunscreens: a review of their use in preventing actinic damage and neoplasia. 1997; 133: 1146-1154.

19.     James EF Reynolds. Martindale the extra pharmacopoeia. The pharmaceutical press, London, 1993; 1233-1235.

20.     Weinstock MA Death from skin cancer among elderly: epidemiological patterns. Arch Dermatol.1997; 133: 1207-1209.

21.     Diffy BL and Grice J. the Influence of sunscreen type on photoprotection. Br. J. Dermatol, 1997; 137(1): 103-194.

22.     DeBuys HV, Levy SB, and Murray JC. Modern approaches to photoprotection. Dermatol Clin. 2000; 18(4): 577-90.

23.     Australian Standards, The Australian photobiology testing facility at the university of Sydney, 1997.


 

Received on 31.10.2009

Accepted on 20.11.2009        

© A&V Publication all right reserved

Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology. 1(3): Nov. – Dec. 2009, 222-225