Formulation and Characterization of Biocompatible Microspheres of
Benzophenone-3
Rathor Shruti1 *and Ram Alpana2
1*
2S.L.T.Institute
of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidhlaya, Bilaspur (C.G.)
ABSTRACT
The objective of present study was to develop gelatin
microsphere containing Benzophenone-3 (Benz-3) for topical delivery, evaluating
the effect of stirring speed, Effect of polymer concentration and effect of cross linker (sugars) on
particle size, surface morphology, microencapsulation efficiency and in vitro
drug release. Gelatin microspheres were prepared using emulsion cum thermal
gelation technique by dropping Benz-3 and cross linker containing solution of
gelatin, into preheated Soya oil. The USP paddle method was selected to carry
out the dissolution studies carried out in methanol at pH=5.5 (pH was adjusted
by using 0.2M NaOH). It was found that the
microspheres with fructose and sucrose have smooth surface having particle size
29.6µm and 80.63µm, respectively. But untreated and glucose treated
microspheres have wavy surface with particle size 50.32 and 45.02µm. It was
observed that untreated microspheres and microspheres crosslinked
with cross linked sucrose showed faster release of drug although microspheres
cross linked with fructose and glucose showed delayed release of drug. In vitro
drug release data showed that the formulation cross linked with fructose was
best for sustained release of Benz-3 due to 95% release of drug after 12 hrs
with t50 and t70 of 400min and 560min, respectively. The
release of Benz-3 was influenced by the different cross linkers. Drug release
kinetic from the fructose cross linked microspheres corresponded best to the
first order kinetics.
KEYWORDS:
Bez-3, Emulsion cum thermal gelation technique,
gelatin, microspheres.
INTRODUCTION
Controlled release of sun screening agent is of
interest, for many molecular sunscreens penetrate in to the skin causing photo
allergic reactions and skin irritation. The photo degradation of sun filter
molecules produces sub molecule potentially dangerous for skin because they
induce sensitization and irritation of skin. Therefore there is urgent need for
the development of safer sunscreen system. One of the most common methods of
controlling the rate of drug release is micro encapsulation. The encapsulation
technique normally involves water insoluble polymer as carrier which require
large quantity of organic solvents for their solubalization.
As a result this process becomes vulnerable to safety hazards, toxicity and
cost of production increases also, making the technique nonreproducible,
economically and ecologically at industrial scale. Recently, various
biocompatible and biodegradable water soluble polymers have been investigated
and played great role in replacing organic solvent in the preparation of
microspheres. One another major aspect is cross linkers who are generally
employed in the microencapsulating method where they convert soluble matrix
into insoluble matrix like formaldehyde and glyceraldehydes. But use of such
cross linker causes toxic effects due to presence of residual amount of cross
linker. Alternative conditions of cross linking were used to reduce toxic
effects associated with the cross linker like thermal hardening and use of
sugar for cross linking. The microsphers were
prepared by emulsion cum thermal gelation technique were gelation of polymer
was achieved by the addition of aqueous solution of polymer and cross linker
into preheated soya oil.
PG No. 1:Effect Of
Different Sugar On Surface Characteristics; (A)and(B) – Wavy, (C)and(D) –
Smooth
Table No. 1 Effect of
stirring speed on particle size of GMs of benz-3.
S. No. |
Cross Linker |
Particle Size (µm) at |
Different Stirring |
Speed (rpm) |
250 |
500 |
750 |
||
1 2 3 |
Sucrose Glucose Fructose |
114.8 120.3 104.6 |
96.2 86.3 70.8 |
80.63 45.05 32.6 |
Table
No. 2 Effect of Gelatin Concentration on surface characteristics of
microspheres.
S. No. |
Gelatin concentration |
cross linker |
GMs Surface |
1 2 3 |
0.75gms 1.5gms 3.0gms |
Sucrose Glucose Fructose Sucrose Glucose Fructose Sucrose Glucose Fructose |
Smooth Wavy Smooth Wavy Smooth Smooth Highly rough Highly rough Highly rough |
Natural polymer such as gelatin has been
extensively used for the preparation of particulate drug delivery system by
virtue of its biocompatibility and biodegradability along with absence of
toxicity or allergic problems. Being a water soluble polymer, gelatin has to be
chemically cross linked to become insoluble at 37ºC. This microspheres can be
efficiently employed in the sustained delivery(1,
3).
Benzophenone-3
(2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzophenone) is a commonly used sunscreening
agent in the topical formulation to prevent sunburn and may also provide some
protection against drug related or other photosensitive reactions associated
with UVA light. The main effect of Benzophenone-3 is that it absorbs light
throughout the UVB range (290-320nm) and also absorbs some UVA light with
wavelengths of 320-360nm and some UVC light with wavelength of 250-290nm.
Benz-3 is commonly used in a concentration up to 6% w/w(2).
Figure
No. 1 In vitro drug release from microspheres.
Table
No. 3 Effect of Cross Linker on particle size and surface characteristics of
GMs of benz-3
S. No. |
Cross Linker |
Particle Size (µm) |
GMs Surface |
1 |
Gelatin |
50.32±10.0 |
Wavy |
2 |
Gelatin/Glucose |
45.02±7.5 |
Wavy |
3 |
Gelatin/Sucrose |
80.63±8.3 |
Smooth |
4 |
Gelatin/Fructose |
32.6±4.0 |
Smooth |
Table
No. 4 Effect of Cross Linker on Microencapsulation Efficiency..
S. No. |
Cross Linker |
Microencapsulation Efficiency |
1 2 3 |
Sucrose Glucose Fructose |
80% 92% 89% |
Materials:
For microspheres- Benzophenone-3
(Fulford (
Methods:
Microencapsulation
method:
Microspheres
were prepared by emulsion cum thermal gelation technique. 10 ml of 15% w/v
gelatin solution containing 5% w/w of sugar, at 80°C, were added to 200ml Soya oil. 500 mg Benzophenone-3
was added to the gelatin solution. The mixture was mechanically stirred to form
o/w emulsion, under laminar flow, after 5 mints the
solution was rapidly cooled at 15°C. 250ml of acetone were added to dehydrate and
flocculate coacervate droplets. The microspheres was isolated by filtration through sintered
glass filter. Residual oil over the microspheres was removed by washing with
250ml of acetone. After preparation of microspheres they were stored at room
temperature in a dessicator at 8% relative humidity,
otherwise drying conditions can influence gelatin microspheres release of drug.
Fiftee mm diameter vessel, a three blade turbine
rotator of 35 mm in diameter and stirring speed of 750 r.p.m.
was selected, 500mg/batch of gelatin were used and the ratio between gelatin
solution and oil phase was 0.21(v/v)(1,4).
Figure
No. 1 In vitro drug release from microspheres.
Characterization
of Micospheres:
Particle size analysis of gelatin microspheres was
determined using binocular microscope. Surface morphology and particle size of
microspheres were also studied using scanning electron microscopy(5).
Drug
content and drug release measurements of microspheres:
10 mg of gelatin microspheres was milled and immersed
in methanol and stirred for 3 h and then left at room temperature overnight.
Benzophenone-3 was soluble in this medium. The remaining gelatin particles were
separated. Drug Content of this solution was determined using UV
spectrophotometer at 285nm. In vitro drug release from microspheres was
determined in methanol at pH=5.5 (pH was adjusted by using 0.2M NaOH). 2 g of microspheres were placed in 900 ml release
medium in USP paddle type dissolution rate test apparatus, stirring at 40 rpm.
The release medium was maintained at 37±0.2ºC. 5 ml Samples of release medium
were removed at different time intervals and replaced with the same amount of
fresh medium each time(8). Samples were analyzed
spectrophotometrically at 285 nm(6).
Microencapsulation
efficiency:
Drug content or microencapsulation efficiency was
determined as the ratio of actual quantity of drug encapsulated within the
gelatin microspheres to the theoretical quantity of drug added during the
emulsification phase and was expressed as percentage(7) .
Actual Yield
% Entrapment =
* 100
Theoretical Yield
Result
and discussion
Effect of stirring speed – We have tested the effect of stirring speed on particle
size. We modulated the stirring speed and obtained that the drug loaded
microspheres which were cross linked with glucose, and sucrose showed the
particle size 114.8, 96.2, 80.63 and 120.3, 86.3, 40.05µm at 250, 500, and 750
rpm respectively. Whilst drug loaded microspheres which were cross linked with
fructose showed the particle size 104.6, 70.8, 32.6 µm at the same stirring
speed (table no1).
Effect of gelatin concentration – We selected three different concentration i.e 0.75gm, 1.5gm and 3.0gm of gelatin. Drug loaded
microspheres with 0.75gms and 1.5gms gelatin and with two cross linkers
(sucrose and fructose) showed the smooth surface whilst the glucose at same
concentration showed the wavy surface. In contrast drug loaded microspheres
with 3.0gms of gelatin concentration resulted in highly rough surface when
cross linked with all three cross linkers (table no2).
Effect of cross linker - One possible mechanism which is involved in the cross
linking of gelatin is – The aldehyde group of
reducing sugars eg. Glucose or fructose can react
with free amino groups of gelatin molecule resulting in the formation of aminoglycosides. These aminoglycosides
again reacts with another amine group and result in formation of cross linked
structure (table no3 and pg no1) (1, 3, 4).
3.1
Morphology of drug loaded microspheres –
Drug loaded microspheres with all three cross linkers showed good spherical
geometry, and in no case aggregation phenomenon was seen. Micropheres
cross linked with glucose showed wavy surface but cross linker sucrose and
fructose showed smooth surface. All these microspheres were free from
microscopic pores. The particle size of drug loaded microspheres cross linked
with glucose and fructose had almost the same diameter. In contrast microspheres
cross linked with sucrose showed increase in particle size.
3.2
Microencapsulation efficiency – It was
observed that the drug loaded microsphere with sucrose and glucose showed
microencapsulation efficiency of 80% and 92% respectively. But drug loaded microspheres
with fructose showed the 89% microencapsulation efficiency (table no.4)
(8).
3.3
In vitro drug release profile from drug loaded microspheres – The dissolution of drug loaded microspheres both
treated and untreated with cross linking agent was performed at 37ºC in order
to simulate typical conditions of dissolution at body temperature. It was
observed that drug loaded microspheres cross linked with glucose and fructose
resulted in a slower release of drug and t50 and t70 were
increased. Whilst drug loaded microspheres cross linked with sucrose was
dissolved in same fashion as untreated drug loaded microsheres
and t50 and t70 of this microspheres were decreased
(figure no2) (8, 9, 10).
CONCLUSION:
The present study was carried out to
develop sustained drug delivery system for benzophenone
-3 using gelatin as polymer and fructose as cross linking agent. Smooth and
spherical particle were successfully developed by the emulsion cum thermal
gelation technique. Stirring speed 750 rpm was most suitable for smaller size
microsphere preparation. Result demonstrated that glucose and sucrose if used
as crosslinker, larger size of microspheres were
obtained with high and low microencapsulation efficiency respectively while
fructose provides smaller size microspheres with optimum microencapsulation
efficiency. Percentage drug release from
the sucrose cross linked microspheres were faster and same as untreated
microsphere while glucose and fructose cross linked microspheres showed slower
release rate. Hence the microspheres with 750rpm stirring speed, 1.5gms gelatin
as polymer and fructose as a cross linker could be
successfully employed for formulating sustained release of Benz– 3.
Further the microspheres could also be incorporated into cream ointment or
lotion base.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The authors are thankful to Mr. O. P. Prajapati (Asst. Manager QC), Fulford
(
REFERENCES:
1.
Cortesi R, Nastruzzi C, and Davis SS
Sugar cross-linked gelatin for controlled release: microspheres and disks.
Biomaterials. 1996; 19:1641-1649.
2.
Cosmetics and
toiletries magazine. Sun Care Formulary. 2005; 120(1): 80-102.
3.
Brime B, Bellsteros MP, and frutos P. Designed preparation and in vitro
characterization of gelatin microspheres containing levodopa
for nasal administration. J. of Microencapsulation. 2000; 83: 731-735.
4.
Esposito E, Cortesi R and Nastruzzi C.
Gelatin microspheres: influence of preparation parameters and thermal treatment
on chemico-physical and biopharmaceutical properties.
Biomaterials. 1996; 17, 2009-2020.
5.
Dinarvand R, Rahmani E, and Farbod E. Gelatin microspheres for controlled release of
all trans retinoic acid topical formulation and drug
delivery evalution. Iranian J. pharm. Science. 2003;
47-50.
6.
Mladenovska K, Kumbaradzi EF, Dodov GM, Makraduli L and Goacinova K. Performed biodegradation and drug release
studies of BSA loaded gelatin microspheres.Int. J.
Pharmaceutics. 2002; 24: 242-249.
7.
Choudhary Dipak K and Mitra Ashim K. Kinetics of in
vitro release of a model nuecleoside deoxyuridine from cross-linked insoluble collagen and
collagen-gelatin microspheres. Int. J. Pharmaceutics. 1999; 193: 113-122.
8.
Vandelli MA, Rivasi F, Guerra P, Forni F and Arletti R. Gelatin
microspheres crosslinked with D,L-glyceraldehyde as a potential drug delivery system:
Preparation, characterization, In vitro and in vivo studies. Int. J. Pharm. 2001; 215:
175-184.
9.
Saparia Beena, Murthy RSR and Solanki A. Prepared and evaluated chloroquine
phosphate microspheres using cross-linked gelatin for long-term drug delivery.
Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2002; 64(1): 48-52.
10. Kazuhiro M, Hideyuki K, and Yoshito
I. Evaluation of gelatin microsphere for nasal and intramuscular
administrations of salmon calcitonin. Eur. J. Pharm.
Sci. 2001; 13: 179-185.
11.
12. Chun Myung-Kwan, Su Chong,
and Choi Hoo-Kyun.
Mucoadhesive microspheres prepared by interpolymer complexation and solvent diffusion method. Int. J. Of
Pharmaceutics. 2004; 288: 295-303.
13. Palmieri GF, Martell S, Lauri D and Wehrle P. Gelatin-Acacia complex coacervation
as a method for ketoprofen microencapsulation. Drug
14. Martin Alfred, Chun AHC and Bustamante Pilar. Physical pharmacy. Lea and Febiger
Philadelphia,
15. Vanichtanukul D. The effect of core to wall ratio and span 80 concentration on the properties of ascorbic acid. J
microencapsulation, 1998, 15(6), 753-759.
16. Bodmeier R, Wang J. Microencapsulation of drug with aqueous
colloidal dispersions. J pharm Sci,
1993, 82(2), 191-194.
17. Robinson J, and Lee Vincent H. Controlled drug
delivery, fundamentals and applications. Marcel Dekker Inc., Newyork. 2005 : 172-174.
18. Neylor MF, Farmer KC The case for sunscreens: a review of
their use in preventing actinic damage and neoplasia.
1997; 133: 1146-1154.
19. James EF Reynolds. Martindale the extra pharmacopoeia.
The pharmaceutical press,
20. Weinstock MA Death from skin cancer among elderly:
epidemiological patterns. Arch Dermatol.1997; 133: 1207-1209.
21.
Diffy BL and Grice J. the Influence of sunscreen type on photoprotection. Br. J. Dermatol,
1997; 137(1): 103-194.
22.
DeBuys HV, Levy SB, and Murray JC. Modern approaches to photoprotection. Dermatol Clin. 2000; 18(4): 577-90.
23.
Australian
Standards, The Australian photobiology testing facility at the
Received on 31.10.2009
Accepted on 20.11.2009
© A&V Publication all right reserved
Research Journal of Pharmaceutical
Dosage Forms and Technology.
1(3): Nov. – Dec. 2009, 222-225